A couple is challenging the UK Government’s cuts to winter fuel payments. They argue that their location shouldn’t disqualify them from receiving this essential support.
They’re being represented by Joanna Cherry, a former SNP MP, at the Court of Session in Edinburgh. The couple is challenging a decision made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves to cut these payments starting in April 2024.
The Fannings used to receive the benefit, but Scottish pensioners were removed from the program when it was devolved. The UK Government’s Attorney General, Andrew Webster, argued that the cuts don’t affect them because of this devolution.
Cherry pointed out that the Fannings have a monthly income of £2,065. She stressed that there was no proper consultation before the cuts were made, which goes against the Equality Act 2010.
She argued that the decision to cut payments was made without considering the impact on people like the Fannings. Webster countered that the cuts were a decision made in England and Wales, and the couple has no entitlement to the payments anymore.
He mentioned that the Scottish Government now handles these benefits. The Fannings are in a tough spot, and Cherry highlighted their limited income as pensioners.
Judge Lady Hood ruled that the couple must cover the costs of amending their case. The court proceedings will continue in March, and many are watching closely to see how this unfolds.
